UTI Asset Management Company Ltd.

NSE: UTIAMC
NIFTY500
₹936.20-22.9%1Y
Last updated 02:55:33 IST· Public market feed (~15 min delay during market hours)

UTI Asset Management Company Ltd.: A 30-second snapshot

UTI Asset Management Company (UTIAMC) reported a net loss of ₹51 crore in Q4 FY2026, with profit down 73% YoY and EPS missing analyst estimates by 41%, triggering a 10% single-session decline — the steepest since its listing. At ₹965.05, the stock sits 16.1% below both its 50-DMA (₹968.43) and 200-DMA (₹1,149.68) and is 33.26% below its 52-week high. Trailing PE is 30.71 versus a forward PE of 16.75 across 17 analysts, with the mean analyst rating data unavailable on the 1–5 scale.

P/E

30.7

Forward P/E

16.8

ROE

+9.8%

Debt / Equity

3.13

Profit Margin

+23.8%

Div. Yield

+2.7%

5Y ROE > 15%

2/5

5Y FCF > 0

4/5

Quality

42/100

Recent context

  • ·Q4 FY2026 results (reported April 23–24, 2026): UTIAMC posted a net loss of ₹51 crore — a swing from prior-year profit — with revenue flat; the stock fell 10% in a single session, the largest decline since its NSE listing.
  • ·EPS missed analyst estimates by 41%, prompting published forecast revisions per simplywall.st (April 26, 2026); the ₹40 dividend was declared alongside the loss-quarter result.
  • ·The 3-month price decline of 12.25% and current RSI of 47.51 (neutral) reflect that the post-results selling has partially stabilised around current levels, with nearest support identified at ₹927.75 and nearest resistance at ₹1,083.

Strengths

  • +Dividend yield of 2.69% with a ₹40 dividend declared for FY2026, and FCF was positive in 4 of the available historical years, indicating recurring cash generation capacity outside the most recent quarter.
  • +Profit margin of 23.8% on a trailing basis reflects that the asset-management business model carries low capital intensity relative to lending peers; revenue was reported up in Q4 even as the bottom line swung to a loss.
  • +Quality score of 54 ranks first (1 of 6) within the assigned peer group, above Bajaj Finance (53), HDFC Bank (47), Bajaj Finserv (23), and HDFC Life (20) — though the peer grouping spans banks and insurance rather than direct AMC competitors.
  • +Forward PE of 16.75 is 45% below the trailing PE of 30.71, suggesting that if earnings normalise toward analyst estimates, the current multiple would compress materially relative to recent history.

Weaknesses

  • Q4 FY2026 net loss of ₹51 crore represents a 73% YoY profit decline and a 41% EPS miss versus consensus, described in coverage as the worst result since listing; news sentiment is 6 negative vs 0 positive across 8 recent articles.
  • Price is 33.26% below its 52-week high, 16.1% below the 200-DMA, and has declined 12.25% over the past 3 months — the stock has been below the 200-DMA for an extended period with no evident recovery catalyst in the near-term data.
  • ROE of 9.78% ranks last (6 of 6) in the assigned peer group, where peers range from 11.28% to 17.91%; only 2 of available historical years showed ROE above 15%, with a consistency score of 38 of 100.
  • The gap between trailing PE (30.71) and forward PE (16.75) implies the market is pricing in a significant earnings rebound — the most recent quarterly result moved in the opposite direction, creating a material execution risk around that implied recovery.

Open questions

  • ?Is the Q4 FY2026 net loss a one-time event driven by a specific write-down or regulatory charge, or does it reflect a deterioration in the underlying AUM-linked fee revenue structure?
  • ?How does UTIAMC's AUM growth and market share trend compare to listed AMC peers (HDFC AMC, Nippon Life India, Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC) over the past 8 quarters — does the revenue growth of 6.7% over 5 years lag the industry?
  • ?What is the basis for the forward PE of 16.75 implied by the 17-analyst consensus — what earnings figure is being assumed, and how does it reconcile with the Q4 loss and the 41% EPS miss?
  • ?Does the debt-to-equity of 3.13 reflect operational leverage typical for an AMC business (e.g., lease liabilities, employee obligations) or does it signal balance sheet risks that a peer-AMC comparison would surface?

Peer comparison: Banking

Ranks 1 of 6 on quality
SymbolNameP/EROEQuality
UTIAMCUTI Asset Management Company Ltd.You're viewing30.7+9.8%54
Industry avgacross 5 peers31.7+14.2%39
AXISBANKAxis Bank Ltd.14.7+13.2%53
BAJFINANCEBajaj Finance Ltd.29.8+17.9%53
HDFCBANKHDFC Bank Ltd.17.2+13.8%47
BAJAJFINSVBajaj Finserv Ltd.28.4+14.6%23
HDFCLIFEHDFC Life Insurance Company Ltd.68.5+11.3%20

Technical state

Current price

₹965.05

SMA 50

₹968.43

SMA 200

₹1,149.68

RSI (14)

47.5 (neutral)

From 52w high

-33.3%

1Y return

-5.8%

3M return

-12.3%

50-DMA

Below

200-DMA

Below

Algorithmic support levels

₹927.75
₹927.20
₹915.00

Algorithmic resistance levels

₹1,083.00
₹1,119.80
₹1,143.90

Risk flags

  • high
    Q4 FY2026 reported a net loss of ₹51 crore with profit down 73% YoY; stock fell 10% on results day — the steepest single-day decline since listing. EPS missed consensus by 41% according to published analyst revisions.
  • high
    Price at ₹965.05 is 16.1% below the 50-DMA (₹968.43) and 16.1% below the 200-DMA (₹1,149.68); drawdown from 52-week high is -33.26%; 1-year price change is -5.76% and 3-month change is -12.25%.
  • medium
    ROE of 9.78% ranks last (6 of 6) among Banking-sector peers whose ROE ranges from 11.28% to 17.91%. Only 2 of available years showed ROE above 15%; fundamental consistency score is 38 of 100.
  • medium
    News sentiment is heavily negative: 6 of 8 recent articles carry negative sentiment, zero positive. Coverage is concentrated on the Q4 net loss and the subsequent share price decline.
  • low
    5-year revenue growth of 6.7% is modest; 5-year earnings growth data is unavailable. FCF was positive in 4 of available years, but the consistency score of 38 reflects irregular profitability. Debt-to-equity stands at 3.13.
  • low
    UTIAMC is classified under the Banking sector in the peer data, alongside banks and NBFCs (HDFCBANK, AXISBANK, BAJFINANCE, BAJAJFINSV, HDFCLIFE); as an asset manager its business model differs materially from these peers, limiting the comparability of sector quality rankings.

Cross-section contradictions

  • Forward PE of 16.75 is 45% below the trailing PE of 30.71, implying consensus estimates price in a sharp near-term earnings recovery, yet the most recent quarter produced a net loss and a 41% EPS miss — the basis for that forward recovery is not evident from available historical data.
  • The stock is 33.26% below its 52-week high and down 12.25% over 3 months on confirmed fundamental deterioration, yet FCF was positive in 4 of available years and the dividend yield is 2.69% — suggesting historical cash generation has not protected the price during the current earnings shock.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. VivaTrades is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Market data sourced from public feeds; consult a registered adviser before any investment decision.

Fundamentals & technicals: refreshed 25 Jun 2026 · refreshed daily at 01:00 IST

AI synthesis (narrative, snapshot, strengths/weaknesses, peer ranking): generated 17 May 2026 · rotates through NIFTY 500 every ~5 days