Back to all stocks
Stock comparison

ICICIBANK vs KOTAKBANK

Side-by-side comparison of ICICI Bank Ltd. and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.. Descriptive only — not investment advice.

ICICIBANK
NIFTY50

ICICI Bank Ltd.

Banking

Quality Score: 71/100

KOTAKBANK
NIFTY50

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Banking

Quality Score: 57/100

At a glance

MetricICICIBANKKOTAKBANK
Quality Score71/10057/100
P/E (trailing)17.019.7
Forward P/E14.011.9
ROE+16.4%+11.4%
Profit margin+24.9%+26.1%
Debt-to-equity
Dividend yield+0.87%+0.13%
1Y price return-11.0%-8.1%
From 52w high-15.0%-16.0%
Analyst rating1 = Strong Buy, 5 = Strong Sell1.251.72

Highlighted value = better on the metric (lower for P/E, D/E, drawdown, analyst rating; higher elsewhere). Descriptive only.

Snapshots

ICICIBANKSnapshot

ICICI Bank trades at ₹1,264.80, a PE of 17x trailing and 14x forward, with ROE of 16.36% and a 24.93% profit margin on 5-year revenue growth of 66.9%. The stock is 15% below its 52-week high, below the 50-DMA (₹1,301) and 200-DMA (₹1,370), and has declined 10.97% over the past 12 months despite an 8% YoY earnings increase in Q4 FY26.

KOTAKBANKSnapshot

Kotak Bank (₹380.80) trades below both its 50-DMA (₹381.25) and 200-DMA (₹408.45), down 8.09% over 12 months and 15.98% from its 52-week high. The bank delivered a Q4 earnings beat but ROE of 11.39% — the lowest among six tracked peers — has drawn market scrutiny, and 5-year revenue growth of -11% contrasts with positive 5-year earnings growth of 9.8%. A notable recent development is RBI approval for Kotak Bank to acquire up to 9.99% stakes each in AU Small Finance Bank and Federal Bank.

Pros

ICICIBANK
  • Highest quality score among 6 banking-sector peers at 64, and second-ranked on both trailing PE (17x) and ROE (16.36%) within the peer set.
  • Forward PE of 13.96x represents a meaningful compression from trailing 17x, suggesting earnings-growth expectations are priced into a discount relative to trailing multiples.
  • Q4 FY26 profit of ₹13,702 cr marks 8% YoY growth with a ₹12/share dividend declared, and 5-year revenue has grown 66.9%.
  • Mean analyst rating of 1.25 across 40 analysts (1–5 scale, lower = more constructive).
KOTAKBANK
  • Forward PE of 11.94 is materially below the trailing PE of 19.66, implying earnings are expected to grow significantly in the near term relative to current price.
  • Profit margin of 26.05% is substantial in absolute terms, and the bank delivered a Q4 earnings beat per recent news coverage.
  • 5-year earnings growth of 9.8% is positive despite a period of top-line contraction, reflecting some degree of cost discipline or margin management.
  • Mean analyst rating of 1.72 across 35 analysts (1-5 scale, lower = more constructive), with 8 news articles tilting 5-positive-to-2-negative in recent weeks.

Cons

ICICIBANK
  • Price is below both the 50-DMA (₹1,301) and 200-DMA (₹1,370), with three resistance levels clustered between ₹1,371 and ₹1,417 — the stock has retraced 15.03% from its 52-week high.
  • ROE has exceeded 15% in only 3 of the years available, and FCF-positive years also number 3, indicating the quality record is not yet a long established track.
  • An executive director sold 59% of his holding in April 2026, which is a disclosure event worth tracking for any follow-on insider activity.
  • Debt trend is classified as rising; while rising liabilities are intrinsic to bank balance sheets, the absence of a precise D/E ratio limits the ability to benchmark leverage against peers quantitatively.
KOTAKBANK
  • ROE of 11.39% ranks 5th of 6 peers and has not exceeded 15% in any tracked year; peers Bajaj Finance (17.91%), Axis Bank (13.15%), and HDFC Bank (13.82%) all record higher returns on equity.
  • 5-year revenue growth of -11% points to top-line contraction over the medium term; debt trend is classified as rising and the consistency score of 32 out of 100 is low.
  • Price remains below both the 50-DMA (₹381.25) and the 200-DMA (₹408.45) with the stock 15.98% off its 52-week high; the nearest resistance cluster at ₹386.45-386.85 is only 1.5-1.6% above current price.
  • FCF was positive in only 3 of tracked years, and with debtToEquity unavailable, the rising debt trend cannot be precisely quantified — a data limitation that makes leverage assessment incomplete.

Want the full analysis for either stock?

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. VivaTrades is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Comparison reflects current public data; consult a registered adviser before any investment decision.