Back to all stocks
Stock comparison

BPCL vs HINDPETRO

Side-by-side comparison of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.. Descriptive only — not investment advice.

BPCL
NIFTY100

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Energy

Quality Score: 61/100

HINDPETRO
NIFTY200

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Energy

Quality Score: 52/100

At a glance

MetricBPCLHINDPETRO
Quality Score61/10052/100
P/E (trailing)8.050.1
Forward P/E8.07.1
ROE
Profit margin+3.5%+0.4%
Debt-to-equity54.3385.37
Dividend yield+6.23%+6.06%
1Y price return+6.9%-3.5%
From 52w high-18.0%-22.8%
Analyst rating1 = Strong Buy, 5 = Strong Sell2.522.90

Highlighted value = better on the metric (lower for P/E, D/E, drawdown, analyst rating; higher elsewhere). Descriptive only.

Snapshots

BPCLSnapshot

BPCL trades at Rs 321, about 18% below its 52-week high, above its 50-day moving average (308.93) but just below its 200-day average (329.11), with RSI at 55.1 (neutral). The stock is up 6.93% over the past year and 8.04% over the past 3 months, even as recent news flow skewed negative following a first quarterly loss in 15 quarters (Q1 FY27) attributed to higher crude costs.

HINDPETROSnapshot

HPCL trades at ₹392.75, 22.76% below its 52-week high and below both its 50-day SMA (₹394.02) and 200-day SMA (₹418.11), though it is up 5.06% over the past 3 months against -3.45% over the past year. Trailing PE stands at 50.1 versus a forward PE of 7.05, and the mean analyst rating is 2.90 across 31 analysts (1-5 scale, lower = more constructive). Among 6 tracked Energy-sector peers, HPCL ranks last (6 of 6) on trailing PE and 4th of 6 on quality score (45).

Pros

BPCL
  • Debt-to-equity is roughly 0.54x and on a falling trend, per the persistence data.
  • Free cash flow was positive in 4 of the tracked years.
  • The stock is up 8.04% over the past 3 months and 6.93% over the past year, trading above its 50-day moving average.
  • Trailing PE of about 8.0x sits mid-pack among Energy peers (COALINDIA 8.2x, GAIL 11.5x, RELIANCE 24.2x, ONGC 6.9x, IOC 5.9x), ranked 3rd of 6 on this metric.
HINDPETRO
  • Dividend yield of 6.06%, alongside 5-year revenue growth of 26.9%.
  • Forward PE of 7.05 is well below the trailing PE of 50.1, implying analyst estimates project a substantial increase in earnings from the current reported base.
  • Debt trend is classified 'falling' in the persistence data, and free cash flow was positive in 3 of the 5 measured years.
  • 3-month price change of +5.06% compares favorably to the -3.45% trailing 1-year change, and price is holding just above the nearest support level of ₹388.5.

Cons

BPCL
  • Q1 FY27 marked BPCL's first quarterly loss in 15 quarters, driven by higher crude oil costs tied to a West Asia-related disruption, despite revenue growth of about 27% YoY.
  • News sentiment over the tracked window is net negative (5 of 8 items negative vs 2 positive), concentrated around Q1-loss coverage.
  • Profit margin is thin at 3.47%, and ROE has exceeded 15% in only 3 of the tracked years (consistency score 61 of 100).
  • The stock trades below its 200-day moving average (321 vs 329.11) and is 18.04% off its 52-week high.
HINDPETRO
  • Earnings-consistency score of 39/100, with ROE above 15% in only 2 of 5 measured years and FCF positive in only 3 of 5 years — signals cyclical rather than steady profitability.
  • Price is below both the 50-day SMA (₹394.02) and 200-day SMA (₹418.11), and sits 22.76% below its 52-week high.
  • Trailing PE of 50.1 is the highest among the 6 tracked Energy-sector peers (next highest, Reliance Industries, is at 23.08), despite a mid-tier quality score of 45 (rank 4 of 6).
  • Reported debt-to-equity of 85.4 is well above what would be typical for an Energy-sector company of this scale; the metric may use a percentage-basis convention (≈0.85x) rather than a raw multiple, so should be read alongside the separately reported falling debt trend rather than at face value.

Want the full analysis for either stock?

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. VivaTrades is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Comparison reflects current public data; consult a registered adviser before any investment decision.