Vedanta Ltd.

NSE: VEDL
NIFTY100
Analyst consensus:Constructive· 4 analysts
₹282.55-32.3%1Y
Last updated 02:59:10 IST· Public market feed (~15 min delay during market hours)

Vedanta Ltd.: A 30-second snapshot

Vedanta Ltd (VEDL) is a diversified natural-resources company in the Metals sector, currently trading at Rs 337.15 — 57.6% below its 52-week high, a decline partly attributable to the company's demerger ex-date in April 2026 which mechanically reset the quoted price. Trailing PE stands at 18.8x against a forward PE of 13.5x, dividend yield of 9.6%, and an exceptionally elevated debt-to-equity ratio of 48.04, making the capital structure the dominant variable in any assessment of the business.

P/E

18.8

Forward P/E

13.5

ROE

+20.4%

Debt / Equity

48.04

Profit Margin

+22.7%

Div. Yield

+9.6%

5Y ROE > 15%

3/5

5Y FCF > 0

4/5

Quality

52/100

Recent context

  • ·Vedanta reported record FY26 earnings and management framed the demerger as the start of a new growth phase; the demerger involves a 1:1 share credit to existing shareholders, with listing timelines under watch as of early May 2026.
  • ·A third-party research outlet (Simply Wall St) noted in May 2026 that analysts covering VEDL had become more bearish relative to prior estimates, citing concerns about earnings quality — the specific downward revisions are not quantified in available data.
  • ·News sentiment across 8 headlines in the tracked window is neutral overall (3 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative); the demerger announcement dominates the news flow and makes contemporaneous price and sentiment signals structurally harder to interpret without demerger-adjusted data.

Strengths

  • +ROE of 20.4% is the third-highest among six sector peers, above Hindalco (10.3%), Tata Steel (11.2%), and Adani Enterprises (13.7%), though well below Hindustan Zinc (76.9%) and JSW Steel (27.3%).
  • +Free cash flow was positive in 4 of the tracked historical years, and the debt trend is classified as falling — the combination suggests some capacity to service and reduce leverage over time.
  • +Forward PE of 13.5x is 28% below the trailing PE of 18.8x, indicating that analyst earnings estimates embed a meaningful step-up in profitability relative to the trailing period.
  • +Quality score of 56 ranks 2nd of 6 sector peers on the available data, above Adani Enterprises (22), Hindalco (31), Tata Steel (42), and JSW Steel (45), though below Hindustan Zinc (72).

Weaknesses

  • Debt-to-equity ratio of 48.04 is structurally extreme for a Metals-sector company; all visible peers carry D/E well below 2, meaning Vedanta carries leverage an order of magnitude above the sector norm.
  • Five-year revenue growth of -41.3% represents significant top-line contraction even as earnings expanded 92.2% — the divergence raises questions about the composition and durability of reported earnings in a commodity business.
  • ROE exceeded 15% in only 3 of the tracked historical years and the consistency score stands at 61, signalling that capital returns have been uneven across commodity cycles.
  • RSI of 33.8 and a price 37% below the 50-DMA (Rs 533.62) and 38% below the 200-DMA (Rs 543.78) reflect a stock well outside both near-term and long-term moving average bands; nearest resistance is Rs 340.65, just above the current price.

Open questions

  • ?With D/E at 48.04 and debt trend described as falling, how many years of current free cash flow would be required to bring leverage to a level comparable to sector peers — and what commodity-price assumptions underpin that trajectory?
  • ?The demerger mechanically reset the quoted price; once demerger-adjusted price series become available, how does the underlying return on the pre-demerger holding compare to the Metals sector over 1 and 3 years?
  • ?Five-year revenue contracted 41.3% while earnings grew 92.2% — which specific line items (asset disposals, working-capital gains, non-operating income) account for the divergence, and are those items recurring?
  • ?Hindustan Zinc — a subsidiary — carries ROE of 76.9% and a quality score of 72; to what extent does the consolidated VEDL earnings and ROE profile reflect Hindustan Zinc's performance, and how does the demerger change that exposure going forward?

Peer comparison: Metals

Ranks 2 of 6 on quality
SymbolNameP/EROEQuality
VEDLVedanta Ltd.You're viewing18.8+20.4%56
Industry avgacross 5 peers24.1+27.9%42
HINDZINCHindustan Zinc Ltd.19.1+76.9%72
JSWSTEELJSW Steel Ltd.14.2+27.3%45
TATASTEELTata Steel Ltd.28.7+11.2%42
HINDALCOHindalco Industries Ltd.19.0+10.3%31
ADANIENTAdani Enterprises Ltd.39.5+13.7%22

Technical state

Current price

₹337.15

SMA 50

₹533.62

SMA 200

₹543.78

RSI (14)

33.8 (neutral)

From 52w high

-57.6%

1Y return

-19.2%

3M return

-53.5%

50-DMA

Below

200-DMA

Below

Algorithmic support levels

₹268.70

Algorithmic resistance levels

₹340.65
₹697.35
₹726.22

Risk flags

  • high
    Debt-to-equity ratio of 48.04 is extreme for a Metals-sector company where all visible peers carry D/E well below 2. Leverage at this level amplifies exposure to commodity-price cycles and constrains refinancing flexibility during a downturn.
  • high
    Current price of Rs 337.15 is 57.6% below the 52-week high. The 50-DMA (Rs 533.62) and 200-DMA (Rs 543.78) are both well above current levels, and the 3-month price decline of 53.5% coincides with the Vedanta demerger ex-date in April 2026 — which mechanically reset the quoted price. Raw 52W and 3M return figures are not comparable to pre-demerger price series without adjustment.
  • medium
    Five-year revenue growth of -41.3% contrasts with five-year earnings growth of +92.2%. In a commodity business, such opposing trajectories typically reflect asset disposals, margin recovery from a low base, or non-recurring items rather than organic top-line expansion — raising questions about earnings-quality sustainability.
  • medium
    ROE has exceeded 15% in only 3 of the available historical years and FCF was positive in 4 years tracked, yielding a consistency score of 61. Combined with a falling-but-still-extreme debt burden, quality of capital returns is uneven across the cycle.
  • low
    Analyst consensus is drawn from only 4 analysts (mean rating 1.86 on a 1-5 scale, lower = more constructive). A single rating revision would materially shift the mean; this consensus carries low statistical weight. Peer priceChange1Y data is null for all 5 comparable companies, limiting the sector-relative price-performance assessment.

Cross-section contradictions

  • ROE of 20.4% is above the available peer median and FCF was positive in 4 of the tracked years, yet the stock is 57.6% below its 52-week high. The demerger ex-date in April 2026 is the primary structural driver of the price reset, which means the raw drawdown figure reflects a corporate action, not necessarily a deterioration in underlying business value — though the two are not mutually exclusive.
  • Five-year revenue contracted 41.3% while five-year earnings grew 92.2%. These diverging trajectories in a commodities business are atypical and the mechanisms driving profitability expansion (margin recovery, asset mix change, or non-operating items) are not directly observable from the metrics available.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. VivaTrades is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Market data sourced from public feeds; consult a registered adviser before any investment decision.

Fundamentals & technicals: refreshed 25 Jun 2026 · refreshed daily at 01:00 IST

AI synthesis (narrative, snapshot, strengths/weaknesses, peer ranking): generated 1 Jun 2026 · rotates through NIFTY 500 every ~5 days