Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd.

NSE: DIXON
NIFTY200
Analyst consensus:Constructive· 29 analysts
₹12,086.00-13.9%1Y
Last updated 02:55:33 IST· Public market feed (~15 min delay during market hours)

Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd.: A 30-second snapshot

Dixon Technologies (DIXON) is an Electronics Manufacturing Services (EMS) company trading at ₹11,103, approximately 39.9% below its 52-week high and 30.9% lower year-on-year. PE of 40.7 is the lowest among its six Consumer Goods sector peers, while ROE of 37.13% is among the highest in the peer set. Debt-to-equity of 18.46 and a profit margin of 2.94% reflect the capital-intensive, thin-margin structure typical of contract manufacturing at scale.

P/E

40.7

Forward P/E

42.9

ROE

+37.1%

Debt / Equity

18.46

Profit Margin

+2.9%

Div. Yield

+0.1%

5Y ROE > 15%

4/5

5Y FCF > 0

2/5

Quality

48/100

Recent context

  • ·Q4 FY26 results beat earnings expectations per SimplyWallSt reporting (May 2026), and multiple brokers including MOFSL flagged near-term margin pressure while noting longer-term EMS volume potential.
  • ·UBS revised its price target downward by approximately 33% in April 2026, citing risks it described as priced in, and retained its constructive rating — a named broker action reflecting the tension between compressed valuation and near-term execution risk.
  • ·Dixon entered a joint venture with Vivo (April 2026 reporting), a development analysts and media are monitoring as a potential lever for incremental EMS market share in the smartphone segment.

Strengths

  • +ROE of 37.13% has been above 15% in 4 of the available persistence years and matches Titan — the highest ROE in the peer group alongside DIXON — indicating capital deployment efficiency relative to most sector peers.
  • +PE of 40.7 (trailing) is the lowest of 6 Consumer Goods peers tracked, with sector peers ranging from 64.9 (Asian Paints) to 95.6 (DMart), placing DIXON at a relative valuation discount on this metric.
  • +Fundamental consistency score of 83 signals that key financial metrics have been relatively stable over the measurement period despite the thin-margin EMS business model.
  • +Mean analyst rating of 2.27 across 29 analysts (1–5 scale, lower = more constructive), with named brokers UBS (maintained its constructive rating post price-target revision), MOFSL, and multiple others flagging near-term headwinds while retaining constructive stances.

Weaknesses

  • Debt-to-equity of 18.46 is the primary structural risk: for a non-financial consumer-sector company with 2.94% net margins, this level of leverage leaves limited room for revenue shortfalls or interest-rate increases.
  • FCF was positive in only 2 of the available persistence years, confirming that growth has been predominantly funded externally rather than through operating cash generation.
  • 5-year earnings growth of -36.1% against 5-year revenue growth of 2.1% indicates that margins have compressed materially over the medium term, not expanded, which is the opposite of what an EMS scale story typically promises.
  • Quality score of 16 ranks DIXON 6th of 6 Consumer Goods peers — the weakest composite quality in the comparison set — driven by leverage and FCF characteristics rather than ROE alone.

Open questions

  • ?Does DIXON's 18.46 debt-to-equity reflect a business model that structurally requires high working-capital financing, or does it indicate balance-sheet stress that could constrain future capacity investment?
  • ?The 5-year earnings CAGR of -36.1% alongside a consistency score of 83 and 4 years of ROE above 15% appears contradictory — what specific year or event drove the earnings base that produces this negative 5-year figure?
  • ?EMS margins globally are thin (1–4%), and DIXON operates at 2.94% — at what revenue scale or product-mix shift would margin expansion become structurally achievable, and what are the historical precedents among comparable EMS peers?
  • ?Given the 39.9% drawdown from the 52-week high and the Vivo JV announcement, what execution milestones over the next 2–4 quarters would confirm or challenge the bull case for earnings recovery?

Peer comparison: Consumer Goods

Ranks 6 of 6 on quality
SymbolNameP/EROEQuality
DIXONDixon Technologies (India) Ltd.You're viewing40.7+37.1%16
Industry avgacross 5 peers79.6+19.6%37
TRENTTrent Ltd.84.8+27.1%49
ETERNALEternal Ltd.+1.2%41
DMARTAvenue Supermarts Ltd.95.6+12.9%37
TITANTitan Company Ltd.73.1+37.1%34
ASIANPAINTAsian Paints Ltd.64.923

Technical state

Current price

₹11,103.00

SMA 50

₹10,652.62

SMA 200

₹13,622.49

RSI (14)

52.7 (neutral)

From 52w high

-39.9%

1Y return

-30.9%

3M return

-4.4%

50-DMA

Above

200-DMA

Below

Algorithmic support levels

₹10,765.50
₹9,835.00
₹9,630.00

Algorithmic resistance levels

₹11,674.00
₹11,847.00

Risk flags

  • high
    Debt-to-equity of 18.46 is materially elevated for a consumer electronics contract manufacturer; FCF was positive in only 2 of the available persistence years, indicating capital intensity is outpacing internally generated cash.
  • high
    Stock is 18.5% below its 200-day moving average (₹11,103 vs SMA-200 at ₹13,622), down 30.9% over 12 months, and 39.9% off its 52-week high — sustained multi-month technical deterioration.
  • medium
    5-year earnings growth is reported at -36.1% while 5-year revenue growth is only 2.1%; profit margin stands at 2.94%, leaving minimal buffer for cost or competitive pressure. Forward PE of 42.9 vs trailing PE of 40.7 implies market is pricing incremental earnings expansion not yet visible in margins.
  • medium
    Quality score of 16 ranks DIXON 6th of 6 peers in the Consumer Goods sector, the lowest in the comparison set, despite its top PE ranking (lowest multiple at 40.7 vs sector range up to 95.6).

Cross-section contradictions

  • ROE of 37.13% matches Titan exactly and is above TRENT (27.13%) and DMART (12.94%) — a strong return-on-equity print — yet the quality score of 16 ranks DIXON last among 6 peers, suggesting the quality composite captures dimensions (margin, FCF, leverage) where DIXON is weaker than its ROE implies.
  • 5-year earnings growth of -36.1% alongside ROE persistence of 4 years above 15% and a consistency score of 83 is internally inconsistent — either the 5-year earnings CAGR reflects a high base year or a reclassification event, rather than structural deterioration.

For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. VivaTrades is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Market data sourced from public feeds; consult a registered adviser before any investment decision.

Fundamentals & technicals: refreshed 24 Jun 2026 · refreshed daily at 01:00 IST

AI synthesis (narrative, snapshot, strengths/weaknesses, peer ranking): generated 15 May 2026 · rotates through NIFTY 500 every ~5 days