Amber Enterprises India Ltd.
NSE: AMBERAmber Enterprises India Ltd.: A 30-second snapshot
Amber Enterprises trades at ₹7,401, down 0.86% over 12 months and 9.79% over the past 3 months, sitting 17.53% below its 52-week high and below its 50-DMA (7,605.3) though still above its 200-DMA (7,302.12). Trailing PE stands at 147.83x against a forward PE of 38.08x, with net profit margin of 1.46% and ROE of 5.58%. Recent news flow has centered on the July Cabinet clearance of ₹62,500 crore for mobile-manufacturing PLI 2.0, an Oppo joint venture, and a subsidiary's reported IPO plans.
P/E
147.8
Forward P/E
38.1
ROE
+5.6%
Debt / Equity
46.57
Profit Margin
+1.5%
Div. Yield
—
5Y ROE > 15%
0/5
5Y FCF > 0
2/5
Quality
46/100
News
8 headlines · 5 positive · 1 negative
Amber Enterprises-owned IL JIN Electronics picks bankers for ₹3,500 crore IPO - livemint.com
livemint.com
LG Electronics remains top pick; Amber's Oppo JV to drive growth from FY28: PL Capital - CNBC TV18
CNBC TV18
Amber unit buys 1% in Ascent for Rs. 8 Crore - scanx.trade
scanx.trade
Dixon Tech, Kaynes, Syrma, Amber Enterprises, Cyient DLM jump after Cabinet clears ₹62,500 crore for mobile PLI 2.0 - BusinessLine
BusinessLine
Dixon, Amber seen as key beneficiaries of PLI 2.0; upside may be limited - Business Standard
Business Standard
Recent context
- ·Cabinet cleared ₹62,500 crore for mobile-manufacturing PLI 2.0 in mid-July, with BusinessLine coverage naming Dixon Tech, Kaynes, Syrma, Amber Enterprises and Cyient DLM as beneficiaries; a same-day Business Standard piece flagged that 'upside may be limited' for Dixon and Amber specifically within that PLI 2.0 coverage.
- ·PL Capital named LG Electronics its top pick in the space while citing Amber's Oppo joint venture as a driver of growth 'from FY28' (CNBC TV18, Jul 8).
- ·Subsidiary IL JIN Electronics reportedly picked bankers for a ₹3,500 crore IPO (livemint, Jul 24), and an Amber unit bought a 1% stake in Ascent for ₹8 crore (scanx.trade, Jul 3) — corporate-development activity running alongside the PLI 2.0 news cycle.
Strengths
- +Recent news skews positive — 5 of 8 tracked articles positive vs 1 negative — including sector-wide PLI 2.0 policy coverage (₹62,500 crore mobile-manufacturing scheme) naming Amber among direct beneficiaries alongside Dixon, Kaynes, Syrma and Cyient DLM.
- +Forward PE of 38.08x is well below the trailing PE of 147.83x, implying the earnings base used for forward estimates is materially larger than trailing reported earnings.
- +Price remains above its 200-DMA (7,302.12 vs current 7,401) even after the 3-month pullback, and 5-year revenue growth stands at 10.5% with 5-year earnings growth at 11%.
- +Corporate development activity in the news sample includes subsidiary IL JIN Electronics reportedly picking bankers for a ₹3,500 crore IPO (livemint, Jul 24) and an Amber unit's ₹8 crore stake purchase in Ascent (scanx.trade, Jul 3).
Weaknesses
- −FCF positive in only 2 of the years covered by the persistence data, zero years of ROE above 15%, and a consistency score of 25/100 — a mixed cash-generation and return history beneath a 147.83x trailing PE.
- −Trailing PE of 147.83x is the richest among quoted Consumer Goods peers (Asian Paints 55.27x, DMart 83.64x, Titan 85.19x, Trent 92.80x), while net profit margin is 1.46% and ROE is 5.58%.
- −Quality score of 24/100 ranks last (6th of 6) within its assigned sector peer set, with PE and ROE rankings also in the lower half.
- −Down 9.79% over the past 3 months and trading below its 50-DMA (7,605.3), 17.53% below its 52-week high, though price remains above the 200-DMA.
Open questions
- ?Does the gap between trailing PE (147.83x) and forward PE (38.08x) rest on a specific, disclosed earnings driver — PLI 2.0 ramp-up, the Oppo JV, the IL JIN IPO — or a broader re-rating expectation?
- ?What explains FCF being positive in only 2 of the tracked years despite double-digit revenue and earnings growth — working-capital intensity, a capex cycle, or something else?
- ?How comparable is the quality-score ranking (24/100, last of 6) given the peer set includes FMCG/retail names (Asian Paints, Titan, Trent, DMart) rather than electronics-manufacturing peers?
- ?Does the 9.79% three-month price decline reflect profit-taking after the PLI 2.0 news, broader EMS-sector rotation, or company-specific developments?
Peer comparison: Consumer Goods
Ranks 6 of 6 on quality| Symbol | Name | P/E | ROE | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBER | Amber Enterprises India Ltd.You're viewing | 147.8 | +5.6% | 24 |
| Industry avg | across 5 peers | 79.2 | +32.1% | 44 |
| ETERNAL | Eternal Ltd. | — | — | 50 |
| ASIANPAINT | Asian Paints Ltd. | 55.3 | — | 49 |
| TRENT | Trent Ltd. | 92.8 | +27.1% | 49 |
| DMART | Avenue Supermarts Ltd. | 83.6 | — | 38 |
| TITAN | Titan Company Ltd. | 85.2 | +37.1% | 34 |
Technical state
Current price
₹7,401.00
SMA 50
₹7,605.30
SMA 200
₹7,302.12
RSI (14)
44.5 (neutral)
From 52w high
-17.5%
1Y return
-0.9%
3M return
-9.8%
50-DMA
Below
200-DMA
Above
Algorithmic support levels
Algorithmic resistance levels
Risk flags
- highFree cash flow was positive in only 2 of the years covered by the persistence data, ROE has not exceeded 15% in any tracked year, and the consistency score is 25/100 — a weak cash-generation and returns history that sits beneath a trailing PE of 147.83x.
- mediumTrailing PE of 147.83x is the richest among the quoted Consumer Goods peers (Asian Paints 55.27x, DMart 83.64x, Titan 85.19x, Trent 92.80x), while net profit margin is 1.46% and ROE is 5.58% — a large gap between the earnings multiple and current profitability.
- mediumQuality score of 24/100 ranks last (6th of 6) within its assigned sector peer group, and PE/ROE rankings (5th and 3rd of 6 respectively) also sit in the lower half of the set.
- lowThe sector peer set used for ranking (Asian Paints, Titan, Trent, DMart, Eternal) consists of FMCG/retail names rather than electronics-manufacturing peers, and several peer ROE and priceChange1Y fields are null — limiting how directly the sector ranking can be read against Amber's EMS business.
Cross-section contradictions
- News sentiment over the last month is positive (5 positive vs 1 negative of 8 tracked articles, including PLI 2.0 policy coverage naming Amber a beneficiary), yet the stock is down 9.79% over 3 months and trades below its 50-DMA (7,605.3 vs current 7,401).
- Analyst consensus of 1.92 across 25 analysts (1-5 scale, lower = more constructive) sits toward the constructive end even as trailing PE (147.83x) is the highest among quoted peers and profitability metrics (1.46% net margin, 0 years of ROE above 15%, FCF positive in only 2 years) point to a thin earnings base.
For informational purposes only. Not investment advice. VivaTrades is not a SEBI-registered Investment Adviser or Research Analyst. Market data sourced from public feeds; consult a registered adviser before any investment decision.
Fundamentals & technicals: refreshed 12 Aug 2026 · refreshed daily at 01:00 IST
AI synthesis (narrative, snapshot, strengths/weaknesses, peer ranking): generated 31 Jul 2026 · rotates through NIFTY 500 every ~5 days